Do you hear the corks popping, friends?? You should, because the imaginary champagne was just opened and the balloons have been released to the far corners of the internets in honor of ArbitrationNation’s FIFTH ANNIVERSARY! At the end of this week, I will have published 253 posts over the course of five years.
Taking inspiration from other social media sites, I am celebrating this blogiversary by publishing one “listicle” per day this week, five in all. Today, the topic is the five biggest surprises in arbitration law. Full disclosure — this is not based on any statistically valid survey or data. (Neither are any other listicles you click on…) But, it is based on the almost daily emails I receive from lawyers or parties in arbitration, asking me for help. And, this list is about surprises in the law surrounding arbitration, not the process of being in arbitration itself. (That’s for another day.) Caveats out of the way, here we go.
Five Biggest Surprises In Arbitration Law
1.The Arbitrator (and not a court) likely has authority to decide whether the parties must arbitrate and whether their contract (as a whole) is valid (Buckeye Check Cashing; Rent-A-Center). (Yes, you can be forced to arbitrate based on a clause within an otherwise unenforceable contract.)
2.Piecemeal litigation is “A-Okay”; efficiency is not the goal of the arbitration acts (KMPG v. Cocchi).
4. Parties must preserve any bases for vacatur by raising them with arbitrator (if those bases were known or could have been known) (Dealer Computer Services). (In other words, if you may want to appeal your arbitration award based on arbitrator bias, you first have to tell the arbitrator you believe she is biased…)
5. There is still significant judicial hostility to arbitration. Even when you are arguing for arbitration, and the case law is on your side, a court may still find a way to retain jurisdiction or vacate the award. (Examples here, here, and here, and almost every week on this site.)
Watch for a new list tomorrow!